Lists Home |
Date Index |
W. E. Perry wrote:
> I agree with you. To return to the narrower question with which this began, is it not John and Tim who are arguing, in effect, that we must assign a different interpretation in the processing of a attribute that is in no namespace than we might
> assign in processing the same attribute as if it were in the namespace of its element?
Nobody's saying you *must* assign a different interpretation. But
you're allowed to if you want. BTW, I think this is a design error in
the namespace rec, but I also think we're probably stuck with it. -Tim