xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete

Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <200207312334.AAA15353@penguin.nag.co.uk>

If you think unqualified attributes being in "no namespace" is a mistake, 
then it's far better to break such documents than to change what they 
mean. In that way it's a compromise.

If you disagree with Simon and think the current system is okay, then 
you'd be opposed to any change, as your note implies.
	/r$

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] CSS XSL Tranformation
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS