xml-dev - RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)

RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <AndrewWatt2000@aol.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:38:56 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <168.1258827f.2a91e9b2@aol.com>

AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:

> > XHTML 2.0 seems to be the one bright light amongst the 
> > maze of W3C specs currently in vogue. 

> Really??  Can you expound on why you believe XHTML 2.0 to 
> be a "bright light"?

What Simon said.

	http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200208/msg01173.html

I'll just add that simple functionality and common sense appear -- at
least temporarily -- to have triumphed over byzantine theological
imperatives.  :)

/Jelks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

References:
- XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
  - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers
Previous by thread: What is this IDs/pattern rot?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread