[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 11:43 AM -0400 9/17/02, John Cowan wrote:
>Why, because if it were a child, its content would be displayed by old
>browsers that didn't understand it.
>
We're talking about XHTML 2.0 here. Backwards compatibility went out
the window long ago. But yes, I suppose that made sense at the time.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
