[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
[Uche Ogbuji]
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
> > RDDL would almost be an example of this approach. And the xlink
namespace
> > could be a default namespace, so the prefix would not have to be typed.
It
> > would also open up the possibility that these linking elements could
contain
> > optional annotation elements, which could be useful.
>
> Tut. tut. tut. Attributes do not get the default namespace. There is
no
> escaping the xlink prefix, or some prefix at least, under XMLNS 1.0.
>
Yes, I already blushed in public about that one!
Cheers,
Tom P
|
