Lists Home |
Date Index |
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > RDDL would almost be an example of this approach. And the xlink
> > could be a default namespace, so the prefix would not have to be typed.
> > would also open up the possibility that these linking elements could
> > optional annotation elements, which could be useful.
> Tut. tut. tut. Attributes do not get the default namespace. There is
> escaping the xlink prefix, or some prefix at least, under XMLNS 1.0.
Yes, I already blushed in public about that one!