[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie
> [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: Mike Champion; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>
> Strange, Ari first implies that the number of implementations
> is a good indication of whether a specification is simple
> enough, then implies that XQuery is not (presumably because
> it only has around **15 ** implementations?). I don't think
> XML 1.0, DOM Level 1, or XSLT had as many implementations as
> XQuery now has, certainly not at the same stage of
> development. And these implementations are certainly not all
> from major vendors - including some of the better ones.
There aren't 15 implementations of XQuery in compliance with the current
family of specs and I doubt there ever will be given the degree of
complexity, inconsistency, underspecification and outright errors in the
current drafts.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Self-made people have an abundance of working parts.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|