xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-d

Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-d

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:55:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF730@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF730@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> wrote:

| The current attractor seems to be arch form style remapping vs 
| namespaces with the lakshman rekha being self-descriptive vs 
| augmented documents.  Is that it?

Maybe.  But should Sita be self-descriptive or augmented?

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Next by Date: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread