[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> was heard to say:
| Jonathan Robie writes:
|> I would like to have a small number of constructs, such as hrefs,
|> that can be used across XML vocabularies. What's wrong with that?
|
| Nothing, provided you don't expect the whole world to use your
| semantics. In a smaller scope than "all XML", you're welcome to do
| whatever you like with such things.
Given the recent discussion of XLink and HLink and given that the
specific example here is href, I get the distinct impression that you
feel as if someone is trying to force the whole world to use a
specific set of semantics.
I don't think your impression is justified by the facts.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | If you understand: things are as they are. If
XML Standards Architect | you do not understand: things are as they are.
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9mG/7OyltUcwYWjsRAsOaAKCKXJIpgGGXWNpc6R8LovZjEP/4TQCgrZiU
9y139NErEvX/xhVdfkc9xps=
=rq+V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
