[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 10:13 AM, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>> Personally, it's not an interesting solution to me because I want
>> links to be manifest even in well-formed documents that don't have a
>> W3C XML Schema, let alone documents that use other schema
>> technologies.
>
> I don't want to be nasty, but can't this be interpreted as defining
> limits to what the PSVI can be used for and denying its implicit claim
> to be generic which was (as far as I can remember since this thread is
> becoming difficult to follow) Simon's initial point?
I'm 100% with Norm. I want the markup to explicit and
self-documenting, as opposed to off in the PSVI which you only compute
by fetching another (potentially large & complex) resource and
processing it. I have grave concerns about the PSVI in general and its
"implicit claims to be generic" in particular.
> You want links to be manifest in well formed documents because links
> are
> obviously important to you but couldn't I want the same for any other
> type which is important to me?
Yep, but I think links have special importance to the Web and should be
manifest in documents used on the Web. -Tim
|
