Lists Home |
Date Index |
John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
| Norman Walsh scripsit:
|> But if we allowed the PI target to be a QName...
| It can't be. But a PI target *can* be a notation name, which a NOTATION
| declaration then maps to a URI.
Doesn't "can" leave room for false positives? Wouldn't it be better to
have the PI target imply the *presence* of a notation reference within the
body, as per some internal *syntax* which it would be the purpose of the
target to identify?