[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Maybe the code I'm debugging is making me too
dense, or maybe it was the Johnny Rivers concert
this weekend being drowned out by the Christian
rock band across the street, but I don't quite
get this.
Are you saying that given cacheing
or catalogs, one wants to rely completely
on self-description given changes that might
occur asynchronously in the two resources,
or that given cacheing and catalogs, it is
pretty easy to have multiple resources and
defer the maintenance?
No, despite Rivers asking about the "
monster truck rally", we couldn't get
them to turn down. It seems they thought
their message was too important.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Arjun Ray [mailto:aray@nyct.net]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> wrote:
| I'd rather trade two gets for the maintenance costs (yes, one might
| not force the get across the net but do it by making the resource
| dispenser do that work).
Catalogs and caching. The ultimate defence. "You can't make me do
something I may not want to do".
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
