Lists Home |
Date Index |
On 1 Oct 2002 at 12:15, John Cowan wrote:
> Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> > Did that get killed because it went off the rails, or because of lack of
> > interest? Lots of W3C projects seem to wither for lack of interest.
> AFAIU, it turned out not to satisfy anybody, as a result of attempting to
> straddle DTD, WXS, and possible future schemas, plus the conceptual confusion of
> whether it was a LCD view of a schema or an abstract method for reading
> and manipulating a schema.
Not to mention questions such as should the schema have read-only, or read-
write access. And a lot of what people wanted from access to the schema is
still available in the Level 3 Validation module (the Document-Editing