xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:22:37 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <003001c26a2e$b4bb5150$0400a8c0@gandalf> <3D9B4330.5080904@textuality.com> <3D9B456C.1050607@datapower.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Rich Salz wrote:

>> in XML my *business* level validation is going to be doing a lot of ...
> 
> Sure, if your business application has ben (re)written to understand XML 
> and isn't, instead, legacy code fronted by an XML wrapper.  

Good point.  Any wrapper that includes XSD validation is going to be an 
awfully thick "wrapper" though.  And a *lot* of people are writing apps 
that read in XML right now today; I wonder how many of them are 
including an XSD valudation step? -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- xsd validation was RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
  - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
  - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
  - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread