OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] heritage (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML on the Web)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

John Cowan wrote:

> Right enough, but I've never understood *why* you thought it was so important.
> Your general scheme of things would work equally well if there were no syntactic
> agreements at all.

It would not work 'equally well':  there would in many, if not most cases, be a
great deal more work to get to the point given ab initio by a priori agreements. I
have never disputed that building up on every single occasion of processing from
very loosely connected pieces is a lot of work, yet I do not insist on that work for
its own sake. XML 1.0 syntax is the price of admission to the party, and as I am not
entirely an anarchist I do not dispute that there should be such a liminal hurdle.
The goal is not to set the constraints so tight that autonomous processes could not
exercise the full expression of their particular expertise. For the cases which I
have examined--including processing concurrent markup, for which my methods are not
the same as Patrick's--XML 1.0 is an acceptable balance between the work-saving
convenience provided by agreements and the requisite freedom for initiative.


Walter Perry


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS