[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 16:07, John Cowan wrote:
> Exactly. "For compatibility" statements are "must" statements.
> "For interoperability" statements, OTOH, are only "should"s.
Except for W3C XML Schema which says:
[Definition:] for compatibility
A feature of this specification included solely to ensure that schemas
which use this feature remain compatible with [XML 1.0 (Second Edition)]
and means "may if you want to really look old fashioned" :-)
But W3C XML Schema is a different world by itself!
Eric
--
Freelance consulting and training.
http://dyomedea.com/english/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
