[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Oops, I agree. I misinterpreted the namespaces spec. (I have done this
many times before!)
This bogus error is not fixed in MSXML30 SP3 then.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Praj Joshi
Cc: Henry S. Thompson; Joshua Allen; Julian Reschke; XML DEV; Dare
Obasanjo
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] MSXML3SP3 vs illegal characters
Praj Joshi scripsit:
> What do you mean by bogus error here?
>
> According to the namespaces spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#ns-qualnames)
>
> *********************
> Namespace Constraint: Leading "XML"
> Prefixes beginning with the three-letter sequence x, m, l, in any case
> combination, are reserved for use by XML and XML-related
specifications.
> *********************
What that means is that you are not allowed to make up your own prefixes
like "xmlsucks", not that you can't use or declare the standardized
prefix "xml".
--
My confusion is rapidly waxing John Cowan
For XML Schema's too taxing: jcowan@reutershealth.com
I'd use DTDs http://www.reutershealth.com
If they had local trees -- http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I think I best switch to RELAX NG.
|
