[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
>
> UDDI may not be the best player,
> but it does have the quality that what one
> asserts one must back up.
Not true Len. You're talking about non-repudiation. Overview material on
UDDI 3.0 talks about non-repudiation too. Yet, the spec has nothing to
say about it. Nor is an inter-registry trust model specified. It's all
either optional, or wholly unspecified. I'm left wondering what UDDI
actually provides in this area.
It does say that one can optionally digitally sign entries. UDDI 3.0
dsig: http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi_v3.htm#_Toc12653994
Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com
|
