xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)

Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Gert Baudoncq <Gert.Baudoncq@wkeltp.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:16:33 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <8EE431E6CD37C049AEE8361ED5B98AD4127BBB@ELTPSRVEX.wkeltp.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Gert Baudoncq wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 'It is too bad that the SVG world is so dependent on a single 
> closed-source implementation.'
> 
> Have a look at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/SVG-Implementations.htm8
> There is clearly more then the Adobe SVG viewer.

Nevertheless, I stand by my statement that the SVG world is primarily 
dependent on a single closed-source implementation. If Adobe retracted 
their SVG viewer, the SVG world would be in bad shape for quite a while.

  Paul Prescod

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
  - From: "Gert Baudoncq" <Gert.Baudoncq@wkeltp.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread