Re: [xml-dev] Future of XSL-FO at W3C??

["J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>]

Ian Tindale wrote:
 > ...
> The flow notion is quite odd, ...
> Look at the internal document object model of (admittedly a proprietary 
> solution, but one that works in the real world) QuarkXpress, which is simply 
> a tool that allows a designer to place boxes on a page...

Umm, I *like* flows, preciesely because I don't want to take
up the mouse and place all these boxes manually. That's what
the FO processor is supposed to do for me.

J.Pietschmann