[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan) writes:
> >People who do not need XML 1.1 need not worry about it until their
> >business partners start to send it. Then they should find plenty of
> >tools available.
>
> Business partners, right. I don't object strongly to XML 1.1, but I do
> object to notions of communication that are just about business
> partners.
Hmm. I've never restricted "business" to mean only "organizations seeking
profit". To me, a "business partner" can be anyone with whom I have business,
which could include the folks with whom I play pick up soccer some afternoons.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Python&XML column: 2. Introducing PyXML - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/25/p
y.html
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 1 - http://www.webservices.org/ind
ex.php/article/articleview/663/1/24/
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 2 - 'http://www.webservices.org/in
dex.php/article/articleview/679/1/24/
Serenity through markup - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6807
Tip: Using generators for XML processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerwork
s/xml/library/x-tipgenr.html
|
