[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> Well, that's one of the tricky points. It is *not* a well-formedness
> error for an XML 1.0 document to label itself version="1.1",
> version="2.0", or version="mauve". This is neither a violation of the
> BNF grammar nor any well-formedness constraint in the XML 1.0 spec.
Read the errata page.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz.
-- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"
|