[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> > Hmmmph. Well, I proudly put myself on the exact opposite end of this
> > spectrum. XML works for me. I like it, and it has solved many practical
> > problems for me and my clients.
>
> To the house dust mite a flake of dead skin is a sumptuous meal.
I meant to add to my last message (to make it less content-free, even if
that's not cricket to you):
It's telling that you chose to respond to my post, which contained a lot of
discussion of my lack of disaffection with XML, with this bit of perhaps
insolent inscrutability.
And will you ever fix your mail reader to kill all that HTML crap when posting
to mailing lists?
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Python&XML column: 2. Introducing PyXML - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/25/p
y.html
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 1 - http://www.webservices.org/ind
ex.php/article/articleview/663/1/24/
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 2 - 'http://www.webservices.org/in
dex.php/article/articleview/679/1/24/
Serenity through markup - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6807
Tip: Using generators for XML processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerwork
s/xml/library/x-tipgenr.html
|
