[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> "Eschew mixed content" seemed the most ridiculous (and memorable) at the
> time, and I'd been having particular annoyances with general failures to
> appreciate mixed content at that point. (Both W3C XML Schema and RELAX
> NG seem to treat it as a special case rather than as something quite
> normal, though RELAX NG is less extreme in that.)
RNG treats text as a special case? In what sense?
> Looking at the whole project in more detail and with examples, I find
> the whole thing repulsive, at least when taken as an approach to
> creating XML generally. On the other hand, as a human-readable syntax
> for RDF, it's far better than anything else I've seen.
It's always been acceptable RDF.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side
with the giants on whose shoulders we stand."
--Gerald Holton
|
