Lists Home |
Date Index |
>the WG seems to act like doing a 2.0 is a given.
I don't think it's a given.
The Core WG charter says:
The WG will also study the advisability of a version 2.0 of the XML
specification and may undertake the preparation of such a
specification, if deemed advisable.
I don't think we've done any serious study on this question yet.
I have heard a vast range of views on what XML 2.0 should be if there
is one, from a unification of XML 1.x + Namespaces + Infoset + no
substantive changes to a completely redesigned language.
[*] Mozilla's "view selection source" function is great for finding
anchors like this.