xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev] dtds

RE: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev] dtds

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Joe English' <jenglish@flightlab.com>, xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev] dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:48:52 -0600

Elitist. :-)

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@flightlab.com]

A point-and-click IDE might be an effective way
to assemble a working application from prepackaged
components, but that isn't programming.  I believe
something similar is true for schema design.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] equivalentTo vs. XSLT
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev] dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread