xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev]dtds,

Re: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev]dtds,

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: [xml-dev]dtds, sche...
From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:09:11 EST

In a message dated 13/11/2002 10:42:48 GMT Standard Time, abcoates@TheOffice.net writes:

And while I'm sure some spec participants would reel in horror at the thought
of having to deal with a visual dimension as well, there are precedents. UML is
a particularly good one.

SVG is arguably a better one. :)

Andrew Watt

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Tablet PC ink is XML
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Tablet PC ink is XML
Previous by thread: Adaptive/Dynamic Object Models and XML
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Tablet PC ink is XML
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread