[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Daniel Veillard scripsit:
> but what about URI-References ;-)
> <fragment href="foo.xml#[XPointer]"/>
> you still need the context to get hold of the resource and then be able
> to do the XPointer computation.
In that case, the meaning of the relative URI is determined by the context
(viz. the location) of the embedding document, *not* by its content.
This distinction is fundamental, though I admit that xml:base blurs it.
> [H]aving the xmlns() scheme to use the same prefix (when possible) in the
> XPointer and target would allow to make nice examples and exercises in
> an XML Namespaces for Dummies book :-)
Certainly a reasonable "best practice", though of course not possible
in the case of non-sane documents.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today.
--_Specht v. Netscape_
|
