Lists Home |
Date Index |
> > >Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML
> Namespaces because
> > >the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions
> on which I
> I don't think I understand what the alternative is. Is it this?
> Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type
> attributes that have URI(s) describing the element?
Close, but it doesn't work for qualified attributes.
Maybe its time to accept that XML is really just an inconvenient
representation of an infoset.