xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness

RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:53:57 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-16D0AADBF83611D681070003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Me?  I'm not trying to throw out anything.  I'm trying to understand what
the throwers (e.g., Michael Kay) prefer.  I agree that a QNAME datatype
is a mistake, because it's useless without context.
	/r$

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] more QName madness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS