Lists Home |
Date Index |
>0.90 was not in any way RDF-compliant.
see the cached version of Netscape's RSS) 0.9 spec:
If you still have any doubts, try copying the sample into the W3C RDF
A certain amount of FUD is to be expected from vendors that have staked
their reputation (and probably their dollars) on a different horse, but this
is remarkable. On xml-dev. I'm speechless.