[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> writes:
> Well currently interop is not addressed, there is no way to get the
> semantic of the XPointer from the namespaced scheme name.
Surely that's not the point -- the point for interop is simply that
any given application knows the names of the schemes it implements.
Reasonable guarantees of uniqueness of scheme names, such as that
provided by using URIs via QNames, are all that's required to prevent
mistakes here.
No-one _ever_ claimed that using QNames would mean that a
general-purpose XPointer processor would be able to look up the scheme
name and find some operationalisable description of scheme semantics.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
