Lists Home |
Date Index |
John Cowan wrote:
> Jonathan Borden scripsit:
> > Well that is/would be the *benefit* of describing an XPointer scheme by
> > QName/URI. Simon would be able to simply post a description of his
> > extensions on his website, and software would be able to follow his
> > schemes into XML documents. That would be really cool.
> It would be really cool; it's probably well beyond the state of the
> art, unless the "description" were written in Java er sumpn.
Hardly beyond the state of the art. I've suggested in
http://www.rddl.org/fragment-syntax that support for XPointer schemes might
be indicated in a RDDL document (one which might be dereferenced from the
XPointer scheme namespace for example) e.g.
Now it should be straightfoward to add pointers to various language
implementations of XPointer scheme dereferencing mechanisms via something
or whatever, this could be done in a variety of ways.