RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?

["Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>]

I've posted a document for discussion.

http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2

which represents a proposal for a version of RDDL using RDF.

<rddl:resource ID="XSD">
    <rddl:title>XML Schema</rddl:title>
    <rddl:nature resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/>
    <rddl:purpose
resource="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema-validation"/>
    <rddl:related resource="http://example.org/L.xsd"/>
    <rddl:prose>
        <p>An XML Schema for the L language .</p>
    </rddl:prose>
</rddl:resource>

hopefully the above XML is self explanatory -- in which case this is human
readable! I think it is more readable than the XLink version.

Note that this example represents a distillation of discussions on the TAG
list.

Jonathan

http://www.jonathanborden-md.com
http://www.erieneurosurgery.com
http://www.openhealth.org