Lists Home |
Date Index |
Shelley Powers wrote:
>No seriously, my biggest concern recently is that there seems to be an
>assumption that those who are interested in RDF are seeking to replace
>straight XML uses with RDF/XML.
You know what they say about making assumptions...
But when you see:
1. RSS 1.0 - Take an existing widely deployed format and refactor it to
2. This article: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/10/30/rdf-friendly.html
3. The attempted refactoring of RDDL to be RDF.
It certainly does 'look' like those who are interested in RDF are
seeking to replace
straight XML uses with RDF/XML.