Lists Home |
Date Index |
Danny Ayers scripsit:
> I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the
> current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the
> RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an
> <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate.
Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it.
John Cowan <email@example.com>
.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org