xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size

Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "\"Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Mechelen)\"" <Gerben@Casnet.net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:53:44 +0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <200211181217.HAA13976@mail2.reutershealth.com>
References: <200211181217.HAA13976@mail2.reutershealth.com>


> A variety
> of small-scale studies have shown that general-purpose compression is
> generally as good as, or better than, some scheme that knows it's
> compressing XML.

Hmmm.  What about

  http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/xmill/

?

James

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
  - From: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@nihongo.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] RDF
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XML / HTML Transport size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS