[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:09:20AM -0500, Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III wrote:
> A couple weeks back, I mentioned a General Public License that I have been
> drafting with the input of a few others specific to DTD and Schema.
>
> The GPL has been posted at the following link and I would apprecaite any
> comments you have on it.
>
> http://www.xmllegal.org/Legal/GeneralPublicLicense.htm
>
> Somone recently asked me to compare it to the OASIS intellectual property
> policy. My answer is below. Your comments on this would be appreciated as
> well.
Come'on you cannot live in such a closed bubble that you did not realized
that "General Public Licence" and the GPL acronym correspond to an existing
Licence which has been in huge use for more than a decade.
I have no idea what's your Licence expects to convey but you MUST really
really change your Licence name, since it isn't identical to the original one:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
|
