Lists Home |
Date Index |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:email@example.com]
>> True enough. I'm starting to wonder about the pile-up of standards
> around editable, flowable documents.
> * there is XHTML
> * there is XSL-FO
> * there is a new Open Office project which will surely define a new
> word processor format
> * SVG now has textflow features
> The XHTML working group _could_ take it upon themselves to attack this
> particular problem.
<giggle /><snort /><guffaw />
I can just imagine the cacophony that would erupt. People have coronaries
when we talk about small adjustments to linking semantics, and you want us
to tackle THAT?
The HTML WG, for lack of service elsewhere, HAS taken a "leadership role" as
others have suggested in quite a number of areas. When people figure out
that's what has happened, hysteria happens, and 18 months later the bulk of
what we suggested gets implemented, under the guise of someone else dreaming