Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "Rich Salz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:08:41 -0800
- Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Thread-index: AcKcdxmX9bGaLUlzTP6YXCwrvidhJQAAWSSS
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
I have no idea what "doc/lit" means let alone it being the party line at Microsoft. I must have missed that memo.
From: Rich Salz [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thu 12/5/2002 7:58 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Thousands of developers using Microsoft technologies benefit from viewing XML
> as strongly typed data. Users of the .NET Framework DataSet, ASP.NET
> and SQLXML all utilize XML as strongly typed data. However these
people are rarely
> markup weenies thus you won't find them on XML-DEV arguing the finer
points of the
Well, that's because DevStudio.Net pushes them that way.
Which is interesting, in a way, since "doc/lit" seems to be the MSFT
party line. ...