Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "Rich Salz" <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:20:47 -0800
- Cc: <email@example.com>
- Thread-index: AcKceUOTd47zUZYZRGiHdMnQENCpxgAAFbrp
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
My bad. You're one of those people who thinks
XML == Web Services
Well, you're wrong and I'm sure most people on XML-DEV would agree with that. As for knowing the Web Services party line, given that I don't work on Web Services I fail to see why I should know or care what the WSDL/SOAP/etc party line is.
From: Rich Salz [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thu 12/5/2002 8:13 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry)
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> I have no idea what "doc/lit" means let alone it being the party line at Microsoft.
Sorry, WSDL shorthand. document/literal style, as in XML documents as
XML documents, not XML as object serializaton.
> I must have missed that memo.
I guess so; perhaps you can find it among the internal docs supporting GXA.