Lists Home |
Date Index |
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Uche Ogbuji) writes:
> >My objection to their usage depends heavily on custom within the XML
> >community. I thought this would go without saying, but I guess not.
> I've always assumed that "compatible with XML" meant "would pass through
> an XML 1.0 parser without a fatal error". There are lots of ways to
> subset XML and remain compatible on those terms.
Will not pass through an XML 1.0 parser without a fatal error, so ConciseXML
fails that test, right?
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html
4Suite Repository Features - https://www6.software.ibm.com/reg/devworks/dw-x4su
XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965
MusicBrainz metadata - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi