Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility

[Mitch Amiano <mamiano@nc.rr.com>]

Even the trivial example given says that it is not SGML compliant.
Unless some SGML old-timer can show otherwise, positional attributes aren't supported.

- Mitch Amiano

Sam Hunting wrote:
[...snip...]
> Of course, it's nice to see SGML minimization techniques ("</>")
> re-invented. It would be a fun exercise to see if ConciseXML was, if not
> XML compliant, SGML conformant! 
> 
> Sam Hunting
> eTopicality, Inc.