Lists Home |
Date Index |
Even the trivial example given says that it is not SGML compliant.
Unless some SGML old-timer can show otherwise, positional attributes aren't supported.
- Mitch Amiano
Sam Hunting wrote:
> Of course, it's nice to see SGML minimization techniques ("</>")
> re-invented. It would be a fun exercise to see if ConciseXML was, if not
> XML compliant, SGML conformant!
> Sam Hunting
> eTopicality, Inc.