Lists Home |
Date Index |
> I didn't really 'get' this article ... Can someone with a more trained
> eye filter out the exact problem ...
It would appear the publications are entering some sort of 'ratings period' and
they're simply trying to stir up trouble. To drive up page readership counts
it's a lot easier to rant about something with a ton of ambiguities and errors.
Pimping those numbers off to advertisers doesn't usually include a statement
that says the readership thinks the publication/author is an idiot.