[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Why would you think this is not allowed?
-----Original Message-----
From: David LeBlanc [mailto:whisper@oz.net]
Sent: Mon 1/20/2003 11:16 AM
To: Tim Bray
Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Element content
So just to be completely clear on this, if a DTD allows it, then something
like this would be legal?:
<node>yada yada yada
<node> blah blah blah </node>
etc. </node>
or, in xml:
<!ELEMENT node (node+) >
?
Thanks,
David LeBlanc
Seattle, WA USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 0:42
> To: David LeBlanc
> Cc: Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Element content
>
>
> David LeBlanc wrote:
> > A question has arisen about element content. I'm reasonably
> sure I've read
> > that it's illegal for an element to contain itself either directly or
> > indirectly. Is this correct, and if so, can someone point me to
> the relevant
> > section of the XML Recommendation please?
>
> Perfectly legal, happens all the time. Now *entities* can't contain
> themselves, but that's a different kettle of markup -Tim
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
