[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Uche Ogbuji scripsit:
> > I'm certainly not going to put myself through a model
> > as complex as that of TM,. I just can't find that it's demonstrably
> > necessary.
>
> I agree. But I think RDF needs to adopt certain TM insights.
Quite fair. Just to be clear that my reactions aren't pure technological, ah,
mulishness, I have long advocated that RDF adopt the idea of scopes from TM.
TM is fundamentally very sound, from what I can gather, but I also gather that
in many ways it's overkill.
There's another feature of TM I've thought RDF should pick up, but I forget it
now.
Also, I think that owl:sameIndividualAs might have been inspired by TM, since
the last time I remember discussion of standard assertion of the equivalence
of individuals, the key players were not keen on the idea.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
The open office file format - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/librar
y/x-think15/
Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html
4Suite Repository Features - https://www6.software.ibm.com/reg/devworks/dw-x4su
ite5-i/
XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965
|
