xml-dev


FOCUS AREAS \| XML-DEV \| XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK \| REGISTRY \| RESOURCES \| ABOUT

xml-dev

Last updated: Sun Mar 16 16:55:28 2003
1332 messages in chronological order | Thread Index

Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology - From: "Doug Ransom" <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@ktlim.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
XML - Disruptive Technology - From: "Doug Ransom" <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Namespaces conformance tests - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Tahir Hashmi <code_martial@softhome.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Tahir Hashmi <code_martial@softhome.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@lgc.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re:[xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Martin Klang <martin@hack.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Martin Klang <martin@hack.org>
Markup: The Early Years - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Unicode With Angle Brackets - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
XML Parsers - From: "Michael Hoffman" <mhoffman78@hotmail.com>
Re: [xml-dev] trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype. - From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data,XML, and SOAP] - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML,and SOAP] - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data,XML, and SOAP] - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype. - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@lgc.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML,and SOAP] - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: "akmal @ city" <akmal@soi.city.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Tahir Hashmi <code_martial@softhome.net>
Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? - From: Matthew.Bennett@facs.gov.au
Problematical scenarios - From: Matthew.Bennett@facs.gov.au
Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Which XML API? - From: "Joseph" <lists@cephire.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: "Matt" <matt@elyt.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
XML for the Restaurant Industry - From: "Samuel Dorfman" <sam@philly-direct.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Registered Namespace prefixes - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re:[xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: Ken Sall <kensall@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Xpath & conditional filters - From: David Higgins <david_higgins@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Kip Hampton <khampton@totalcinema.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
collisions (was The subsetting has begun) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] special characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
On permathreads - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Some notes on the binxml permathread (was: Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????) - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset vs pure syntax permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev]The subsetting has begun) - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Infoset vs pure syntax permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsettinghas begun) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
pure XML syntax tools - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] special characters - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
special characters - From: monica.coelho@petrobras.com.br
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Call for information about XML-Fragments - From: MASSIMILIANO GRANDI <massimiliano.grandi@usa.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25 - From: "Tech Support" <support@mobileworkspace.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: heikki@netscape.com (Heikki Toivonen)
re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? - From: Matthew.Bennett@facs.gov.au
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
FW: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@lgc.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: Bill Riegel <BRiegel@lgc.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
DOM support in IE vs. NS - From: Ken Sall <kensall@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? - From: "Collin" <collin@seu.edu.cn>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@systinet.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@systinet.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
XML for RFCs - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP - From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@hotmail.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Transformation Error , PLZ HELP - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
[ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003 - From: Sam Hunting <shunting@etopicality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mike Kozlowski <mlk@klio.org>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@dehora.net>
SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project - From: Mark Priest <mpriest@erols.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: Berend de Boer <berend@xsol.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Entity declarations and non-validating parsers - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Berend de Boer <berend@xsol.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: Berend de Boer <berend@xsol.com>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Serializing doc + entities - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
xml/xsl won't display when used online - From: "James Rayner" <rcxau@yahoo.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsettinghas begun) - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] More on Parsing Performance - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Don Bate <donbate@iadfw.net>
The J2ME pseudo-XML botch - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun) - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
More on Parsing Performance - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Parsing Performance - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Fredrik Lindgren <fredrik.lindgren@chello.se>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@evanlenz.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@dynamine.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Amelia A.Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Jon.Ellis@Sun.COM
Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery and SQL Server Yukon - From: "Charles White" <chuck@tumeric.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery and SQL Server Yukon - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@evanlenz.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
XQuery and SQL Server Yukon - From: "Charles White" <chuck@tumeric.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
nillable keyrefs in XSD - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: Open Source or Else - From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@chaeron.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@sark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@ideaspace.net>
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix - From: Anuga Laxmi Kanth Reddy <areddy2@baan.com>
The subsetting has begun - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@fivesight.com>
COLAG Version 2.0 - From: Rahul Jain <rahul@colag.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: Shawn Parker <sparker@socket.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Open Source or Else - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices - From: Enoch Root <enokhroot@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Doug Royer <Doug@Royer.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Jim Ancona <jim@anconafamily.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] print people - From: "Ed Dodds" <dodds@e-dodds.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
[xml-dev] XBRL loan applications [Was: Re:Are the publishing users happy? Why not?] - From: Ralph Hilken <ralph.hilken@artige.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Doug Rudder <drudder@drugfacts.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@ideaspace.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Fw: Report to Sender - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Fw: Report to Sender - From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@ideaspace.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@ideaspace.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Tony Graham <tg127171@tenso.Ireland.Sun.COM>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Tony Graham <tg127171@tenso.Ireland.Sun.COM>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" - From: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: Oleg Tkachenko <olegt@multiconn.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Doug Rudder <drudder@drugfacts.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@clearmethods.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XMLDOM Create object problem - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
XMLDOM Create object problem - From: "asim" <qazi@advcomm.net>
RE: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@ispsoft.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering theoriginal XML vision) - From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@Sun.COM>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Historical question about namespaces - From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@bredband.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@bredband.net>
"Non-Normative" - From: Gregory Murphy <Gregory.Murphy@eng.sun.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Ralph Hilken <ralph.hilken@artige.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision - From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Justin Lipton <justin@ns.xn.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision) - From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@Sun.COM>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@ispsoft.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) - From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@ispsoft.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
OT: Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@seairth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother - From: Lisa Rein <lisarein@finetuning.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Google as Big Brother - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@urbanmarket.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Owen Walcher" <news@owenwalcher.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision) - From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@Sun.COM>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Charles White" <chuck@tumeric.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) - From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@clearmethods.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@data