Lists Home |
Date Index |
It should have been CDATA, of course. I just feel sympathy for those who
have to ship non-XML (i.e., HTML or template languages, or big TIFF files).
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] mischief
firstname.lastname@example.org (Robin Berjon) writes:
>Klotz, Leigh wrote:
>> http://plant.blogger.com/api/sample_getTemplateResponse.xml looks
>>reasonable to me
>Urgh, I'm still in shock since I first saw it. The Geneva Convention
>has something against this IIRC.
XML 1.0 production  does, certainly, because of this:
I wrote a trivial bit of code that would let me write templates in XML
(I was using XSLT to generate them) and then convert them to BloggerML
or whatever we'd like to call it:
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org