xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)

Re: [xml-dev] Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:28:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC081@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>

clbullar@ingr.com (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Why not NDATA?

I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will.

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

References:
- Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)
Next by Date: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
Previous by thread: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] CDATA)
Next by thread: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread