Lists Home |
Date Index |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> In a message dated 12/04/2003 18:25:06 GMT Daylight Time,
> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > But I've always been skeptical that Microsoft has it in their DNA to make
> > the fundamental changes in outlook required to truly open up XML to their
> > Office users. Even the slickest UI cannot overcome a mismatch between the
> > interests of a vendor and its customers, which, I think has become very
> > large recently in the case of MS.
> Realistically, do you do all your coding for free? Do I write or code for
> free? If we did do everything for free then, in one sense, our customers
> would ... in the short term at least ... benefit. But it isn't a sustainable
> business model, or so it seems to me.
Try actually reading what you just quoted above. Your response is so
completely off point from what I posted that I wonder whether you did
actual;ly read my message.
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Gems From the [Python/XML] Archives - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/04/09/py-xm
Introducing N-Triples - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi
Use internal references in XML vocabularies - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerw
EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html
The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238
Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/develo