xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] NIH in multiple facets

Re: [xml-dev] NIH in multiple facets

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] NIH in multiple facets
From: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@whitemesa.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:25:09 -0600
References: <E196KDu-0007rS-00@borgia.local>

Uche Ogbuji wrote:

> Developers
> should also be very conscientious about seeking out ontologies developed
by
> other parties for import, rather than reinventing the wheel.  I think this
is
> much more important than worrying about whether the other ontology is
*just*
> the right fit for your application.

Is there a risk that reuse of ontologies may be limited by other factors,
such as licensing and competition considerations?

RC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] NIH in multiple facets
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>

References:
- NIH in multiple facets
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Why Use OWL?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Syntax vs semantics
Previous by thread: NIH in multiple facets
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] NIH in multiple facets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread